Youth, mobility and media


Simple Rules

Simple Rules of Beavers, by duncan

Moving from a closed circle of networked communications, that is, me and my friends towards one where brands come into play is transforming certain platforms, namely mobile phones and television. It is a fact.  There are two big rules in programme scheduling: choose your audience and sell advertising space that they are receptive to. This is why during the Rugby World Cup final,  AUDI showcased its latest powerhouse of an engine… wowing everyman in the pub. And our “Britain’s Next Top Model” is sponsored by a make-up brand. In the case of youth audiences, brands are beginning to segment more than ever. It looks like the battle of the sexes is up and you are either a fashion-crazed aspiring kitten or an mbox-addict/sports-mad dude. What is to happen to unisex brands, like music or design-driven brands, which is a harder kind to juggle?

I call these brands the “Life Soundtrack Brands”. They are not trying to sell me anything in particular, because the market is well aware of who they are and what they sell, but are reminding me of how great it is to live in this world with them around me/on me/ in my house. Perhaps their message to my phone is for me to come to one of their shops to checkout the new interior, their new stock of goodies - this is Apple’s super stores strategy, or download a mini video of their latest campaign, designed to interact with me on tv, the web and my mobile. Whatever it is that comes to my phone, I repeat, has to be under the following expectations:

(a) the brand is known to me and I like it;

(b) the brand is new to me but the ad is so cool, I actually like it;

(c) the brand is not known to me but their stuff rocks and I want to know more about them (and the ad is cool, too);

Most of the time, we get (d):

(d) the brand has no impact on my psyche, probably because they are using the same campaign on TV (and I’ve already watched their ads five hundred times whilst watching “Hollyoaks”) or the campaign is just lame… visually unengaging, boring creative, old advertising stereotypes…

It’s also about not bombarding the same ad a hundred times a week. A given ad is as good as its limited broadcast. Remember Budweiser’s “Wassup?” ads… they only got better when people began to do mash-ups online… eventually, the ones broadcasted on TV managed to annoy the whole nation… as half your friends began to greet you with such parody every time you’d show up at their place and rang the doorbell… I have little patience for this lemming behaviour, you may have noticed…

People like ads when they are good. They even watch them in youTube. Not every ad on TV falls under this category. Current washing up liquid ads are just domesticity at its worst. Or softdrinks. By the way, have you noticed there has never been a RedBull ad on TV? And you want to know why? Because they came to where their audiences were and built a presence there, sponsoring bmx events and creating a drink that would serve the demands of hardcore clubbers.

Brands have an excellent opportunity to make themselves loved and respected in the mobile sphere, but the same rules will apply here to that of niche sports events sponsoring:

(a) put your money where your mouth (desire to market to me & my friends) is;

(b) understand the rules of my game and how I will let you into my inner circle (see rules above);

(c) come to me with a product that truly will improve my lifestyle and let me know about that product with bespoke mobile creative output: this is my phone, not the public TV broadcast network…

… is that alright with you? It is that simple…

Entry Filed under: Consumer Rant

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Kevin Marks  |  November 26th, 2007 at 4:22 pm

    There have definitely been Red Bull ads on TV - I remember the cartoon ‘red bull gives you wings’ series from when I was in the UK 10 years ago. I’m sure they’re on YouTube…

  • 2. Inma Martinez  |  November 26th, 2007 at 6:51 pm

    Yes, you’re right, but that was after years and years of being in the market, sponsoring bmx and clubbing nights. When that campaign went on broadcasted air, it was to transfer the brand to a larger audience as a matter of brand presence. The market was already theirs… and everyone had been ordering vodka-redbulls for years…

    Still, the ads were innovative because the animation values were very strong… innovative, still when doing commercials.

    Thanks for the point, it has brought better background!

  • 3. Biff  |  November 27th, 2007 at 11:46 am

    Yeah you’re right. But the Red Bull ads have now reached the point of annoyance. The joke is no longer funny, and the animation style has is outdated (and also quite annoying).

    That’s for me though, and I only ever see them in between soaps when visiting the folks, and they seem to like them (although I can’t imagine my mum and dad drinking Red Bull).

    A more recent example of excellent restraint on behalf of the purchasers is the Phil Collins Gorilla for Cadbury’s. I have only ever seen the full version twice, and the truncated version a handful.

    The elevation of advertisement to art is indeed a wonderful thing. You get longer cuts at the cinema, teaser trailer ads (like the guiness domino one - “good things come to those who wait!”), and for those who know where to look on the net there’s the sick viral spoofs (like the cat in the sunroof one) and great take-offs (tango’s version of sony’s bouncy balls).

    If you’re going to push an ad on someone, it must be artistically and intellectually stimulating. As a 25 year old, I respond better when I feel I’m being treated rather than manipulated. Variation will also be key in pushed advertising, there must be a sense somewhere of being the first to discover a great ad.

    ~biff~

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Calendar

November 2007
M T W T F S S
    Dec »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930