and here comes Google!
I admit it. I’d been wishin’ and hopin’ and prayin’ that Google would launch some new phone that would change the landscape of mobile telephony. Instead, with the Open Handset Alliance, it seems as though we got a vision and a committee.
Of course, I’m being a bit harsh here. What this alliance is trying to do is really important. Philosophically, they’re saying that the current paradigm is Dysfunctional with a capital D. Without a platform and standards, developers cannot efficiently build software that users want. I couldn’t agree more. It’s simply depressing to think of what creative developments could emerge if only there weren’t so many barriers to interaction. Yet, I’m having a hard time getting my head around why a Google OS is the answer.
There are no standard operating systems in the world of mobile. Microsoft has their mobile OS. Then there’s Palm. And lots of companies build their own OSes with varying options for trying to build software for them: Nokia, Motorola, iPhone, Danger, etc. Some require handset signoff of apps and most require carrier signoff. Even more problematically, it’s just downright ugly to write software for most of these phones. Google wants to change that. And it looks like for some phones, it will. But not all carriers are in. And not all handset makers are in.
So will this actually bridge anything, or will it only introduce another segmentation into the market that makes it more difficult for users to interact with one another?
Right now, honestly, I can’t read between the soft and fuzzy marketing lines to make heads or tails of where things are going. But the Android Challenge will certainly make a few geeks happy.
Entry Filed under: Technologies

2 Comments Add your own
1. Bertil | November 15th, 2007 at 3:12 pm
Well, Google has been taking a lot of crap recently, and they can’t both resume to reasonable hiring rates and do all what they want — so it’s normal they try to help people find the solution themselves, instead of deciding on the right one.
Too much bad vibes in handling the day-to-day business when you are literally everybody’s hope.
Other then the Android OS, what is on? The OpenSocial OS. . . Merging anyone?
What else could they do on mobile? Network (antennas) and terminal (devices): they can do #1 better then anyone, but they need a license, and I don’t think they spare any effort to get it (in the USA); #2: Chinese do it better, cheaper; plus, their “buy it cheap and poor quality, disconnect the 20% dysfunctional” approach would be great for cell phones — but need time to implement: address books & call logs have to be in the clouds, not the safest solution.
I do believe that what appears a small opening step will prove very empowering for emerging mobile operators: no need to be big & old to have great services. Although, like Facebook’s News feed, it doesn’t really make sense at first.
2. Chinese iPhones | September 7th, 2008 at 10:13 pm
Thanks for having such a great resource for iPhones. I\’ve been searching all over for this. http://www.iphonehub.com/iPhone/Chinese-iPhones
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed